Search for: "Microsoft Corp v. Lucent Technologies, et al"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Microsoft also appeals the $357,693,056.18 jury award to Lucent Technologies, Inc. for Microsoft's infringement of the Day patent. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Panduit Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5] Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Microsoft and Dell Corporation, reversed the District Court’s summary judgement against an Alcatel-Lucent patent on web-technology, Federal Circuit, Spring 2008 Forest Laboratories and Lundbeck v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Microsoft et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Packeteer Inc., et al. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
Winn, et al. (09-987). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Acer et. al. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
Traffic Information LLC(Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Cookies-functional web browser was ready for patenting when initial draft of source code was logged into repository: Netscape Communications Corp., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
: (Michael Geist),Prentice backtracks on Treaty Policy: (Michael Geist),Microsoft misleads o [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
